X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4F39DC81C; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:12:22 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 78432-01; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:12:22 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from hosting.commandprompt.com (128.commandprompt.com [207.173.200.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD399DC881; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:12:17 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.sprint-hsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by hosting.commandprompt.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0H032NL027270; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:03:03 -0800 Message-ID: <43CC36BF.6050409@commandprompt.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:13:51 -0800 From: "Joshua D. Drake" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jim C. Nasby" CC: David Fetter , "Marc G. Fournier" , gforge-admins@pgfoundry.org, pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: PgFoundry Move References: <43CBE53E.5090106@commandprompt.com> <20060116145602.C28752@ganymede.hub.org> <20060116202147.GC14577@fetter.org> <20060117000207.GQ67693@pervasive.com> In-Reply-To: <20060117000207.GQ67693@pervasive.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (hosting.commandprompt.com [192.168.1.101]); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:03:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.064 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.064] X-Spam-Score: 0.064 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/183 X-Sequence-Number: 9371 > I'm not sure why going with CMD means this has to be on linux. Because we are a Linux shop it has nothing to do with FBSD as much as it has everything to do with Linux. As I said earlier I can run FBSD, I prefer Linux. Having one OS in the facility greatly decreases costs in maintenance, administration etc.. and allows us to keep up to date on important things easier. > Surely > someone there could get a box up and running FBSD to the point where > someone remote could finish install and config. Or just ship a > pre-installed box there... Sure and I could easily do so myself but see above. > > affairs) seems folly. I guess I can see using jail if it makes failover > easy (I've never used it myself, but I don't know of any reason why it'd > add appreciable overhead), Well done correctly a jail isn't any more useful then a standard server, shared or otherwise. It is just a matter of documentation and scripting. > but trying to run something that big in a > shared environment is pretty silly. If anything I'd say it's big enough > that there should be more than one machine hosting it, such as database > server, webserver, shell/SCM server. It should be noted that Pgfoundry does not take a ton of resources at this time. Although having it on a machine with almost 50 other vms is quite silly. > I know there's a lot to be said for everything running on the same OS, > but the fact is pgFoundry has been sucking wind to various degrees for > months now; if we can't fix that quickly while staying on FBSD and we've > got offers to handle OS-level admin then we need to look at moving. What > we can't do is let this drag on for another year. That is kind of my point. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/