X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0249DCC5C for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:37:11 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02149-10 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:37:14 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from hosting.commandprompt.com (128.commandprompt.com [207.173.200.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE0D9DCC55 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:37:07 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.sprint-hsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by hosting.commandprompt.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1E3PwO4013804; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:25:59 -0800 Message-ID: <43F15125.7020407@commandprompt.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:40:21 -0800 From: "Joshua D. Drake" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Treat CC: pgsql-www@postgresql.org, emily@emilyboyd.com, omar@tinysofa.org Subject: Re: Need license clarification on some web graphics References: <200602111050.29602.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <200602132206.32326.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <200602132206.32326.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (hosting.commandprompt.com [192.168.1.101]); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:26:01 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.086 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086] X-Spam-Score: 0.086 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200602/37 X-Sequence-Number: 9503 Robert Treat wrote: > On Saturday 11 February 2006 10:50, Robert Treat wrote: > >> I've recieved a submission of some postgresql related web graphics that I >> was planning to add to the graphics repository. While I was uploading them >> the thought hit me that we might have a problem with some of these. First >> two examples of ones that are ok: >> >> http://xzilla.postgresql.org/layout/images/2_160x600.gif >> http://xzilla.postgresql.org/layout/images/14_160x600.gif >> >> both very nice and wonderful, but I am wondering about this one: >> >> http://xzilla.postgresql.org/layout/images/15_160x600.gif >> >> It uses the "photo elephant" which I not sure what the license status is. >> The relevant link in the archives seems to be >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2004-12/msg00290.php >> but it is less than definitive since we would not be using these images on >> the postgresql website per say, they would be out in the wild (though under >> a cc license). I have about a dozen more of these using the "photo >> elephant" so before I put them up, can I get an ok from someone? >> > > So I guess given no response in 48 hours, I should assume that these photos > are legally poisoned? In that case can we get a new elephant photo that we > can use on the website and in web buttons? Joshua, you mentioned something > way back when about making a replacement pic, how about now? > Are you speaking to this Joshua? Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/