X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6767E9DCC49;
	Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:17:55 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 88405-06; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:17:55 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from hosting.commandprompt.com (128.commandprompt.com
	[207.173.200.128])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE6509DCBC8;
	Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:17:52 -0400 (AST)
Received: from [192.168.1.55] (fc1smp [66.93.38.87]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by hosting.commandprompt.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id
	k1SJ5dds006156; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:05:40 -0800
Message-ID: <4404A32F.7090509@commandprompt.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:23:27 -0800
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Organization: Command Prompt, Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051025)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: josh@agliodbs.com
CC: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org, Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>,
	Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>,
	Bruce Raup <brauplists@gmail.com>, pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Is Sourcewear defunct?
References: 
 <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40103E4B1@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
	<200602281101.06425.josh@agliodbs.com>
In-Reply-To: <200602281101.06425.josh@agliodbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by
	milter-greylist-1.6 (hosting.commandprompt.com [192.168.1.101]);
	Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:05:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.136 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.136]
X-Spam-Score: 0.136
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200602/115
X-Sequence-Number: 9581


> As a pisser, this also means that we won't get the money they pledged us 
> for 2005.  :-(    And good luck to customers on collecting a refund ... I 
> suggest calling your credit card company and issuing a chargeback -- you 
> generally have 90 days to do so.
>
> CafePress, anyone?
>   
I have had excellent luck with CafePress. I bet we could even get the 
account to directly
submit to the SPI account. That way money goes directly on each purchase 
to PostgreSQL.

Joshua D. Drake