X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CAF89DCB94 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:37:42 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81766-07 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:37:41 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from projects.commandprompt.com (host-130.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA189DCA2F for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:37:39 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.1.5] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.sprint-hsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by projects.commandprompt.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2NHbZsi001451; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:37:36 -0800 Message-ID: <4422DCDC.6030705@commandprompt.com> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:37:32 -0800 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060309) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jim C. Nasby" CC: Chris Browne , pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Major donors References: <200603111054.52910.josh@agliodbs.com> <20060322154523.GH15742@pervasive.com> <60r74utf9g.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com> <20060323171440.GC90527@pervasive.com> In-Reply-To: <20060323171440.GC90527@pervasive.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (projects.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:37:36 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.088 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.088] X-Spam-Score: 0.088 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200603/167 X-Sequence-Number: 8752 Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 03:07:23PM -0500, Chris Browne wrote: >> jnasby@pervasive.com ("Jim C. Nasby") writes: >>> It also might not make sense from a financial perspective. $1k is >>> quite a lot for most individuals, but it's a tiny sum for all but >>> the smallest companies. >> I suspect it's a more significant thing, in fact, if a project >> attracts contributions from 50 individuals that add to $1000 (that's a >> mere $20 apiece) than if it attracts $10K from a corporate donor. > > I don't know about that; people tend to get a 'warm-fuzzy' when they > find out that major corporations are using/promoting/contributing to > PostgreSQL. My experience is that in order to get "Major Sponsors" they have to be listed as such. Companies don't give to OSS projects for the heck of it. They want something in return. That being said, there is a ton of "donations" that happen that make people major sponsors. Every member of core is a major sponsor. Red Hat is a major sponsor because they pay Tom, but Tom is a major sponsor because I know he spends well more then 40 hours a week on this project. As sponsors page that will delineate between size of monetary contribution is going to cause problems with those who donate a great deal of in-kind contributions. Elein is a perfect example. If she goes to 3 shows how much is that worth? My day rate is 2500.00 (if I am out of towm) plus expenses.... Frankly I would say: Two pages, one for businesses, on for individuals. To qualify to be on the page you have to donate more then "X" in-kind + dollars. The pages are alphabetical, no graphics. Joshua D. Drake