X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4282C9DC851 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:17:04 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 88610-08 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:17:03 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com (ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.58]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D8F9DC9B1 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:17:01 -0400 (AST) Received: from rochester.rr.com (rrcs-72-43-255-246.nys.biz.rr.com [72.43.255.246]) by ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2NIH0ER016705 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:17:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4422E5EE.6020300@rochester.rr.com> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:16:14 -0500 From: Mike Ellsworth Reply-To: nhrcommu@rochester.rr.com Organization: HR Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en,ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Major donors References: <200603111054.52910.josh@agliodbs.com> <20060322154523.GH15742@pervasive.com> <60r74utf9g.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com> <20060323171440.GC90527@pervasive.com> <4422DCDC.6030705@commandprompt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.299 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.299] X-Spam-Score: 0.299 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200603/168 X-Sequence-Number: 8753 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Jim C. Nasby wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 03:07:23PM -0500, Chris Browne wrote: >> >>> jnasby@pervasive.com ("Jim C. Nasby") writes: >>> >>>> It also might not make sense from a financial perspective. $1k is >>>> quite a lot for most individuals, but it's a tiny sum for all but >>>> the smallest companies. >>> >>> I suspect it's a more significant thing, in fact, if a project >>> attracts contributions from 50 individuals that add to $1000 (that's a >>> mere $20 apiece) than if it attracts $10K from a corporate donor. >> >> >> I don't know about that; people tend to get a 'warm-fuzzy' when they >> find out that major corporations are using/promoting/contributing to >> PostgreSQL. > >> .......... > > > Elein is a perfect example. If she goes to 3 shows how much is that > worth? My day rate is 2500.00 (if I am out of towm) plus expenses.... > > Frankly I would say: > > Two pages, one for businesses, on for individuals. To qualify to be > on the page you have to donate more then "X" in-kind + dollars. > > The pages are alphabetical, no graphics. > > Joshua D. Drake > > Without comment or opinion on the eventual approach, "cut-off $" or monetization of non-cash contributions, a person/entity should receive a brief "Thank you!" directly from PostgreSQL.org - regardless of the size of the $$ contribution. As it is now, if you go the SPI route, you get a confirm from SPI but NADA from PG. Not everyone needs or wants to have their names in lights, but I am reasonably sure that anyone donating via SPI would at least like to know that PG received the funds and that the contribution, however minute, was received and appreciated. There may be a timing issue on the funds transfer, but somehow/someway/sometime, a Thank You needs to be triggered. $10 may be peanuts to some, but not everywhere in the world. Elephants like peanuts. Eat 'em right up.