X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2FE9DCA59 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 12:53:18 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 73329-10 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 12:53:15 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from projects.commandprompt.com (host-130.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0CFB9DC81F for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 12:53:14 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.sprint-hsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by projects.commandprompt.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2PGrFaq010535; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 08:53:15 -0800 Message-ID: <442576D2.5070104@commandprompt.com> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 08:58:58 -0800 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060309) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane CC: PostgreSQL WWW Subject: Re: search.postgresql.org References: <4424DBC3.3020704@commandprompt.com> <15170.1143266875@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <15170.1143266875@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (projects.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Sat, 25 Mar 2006 08:53:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.588 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.409, URI_NOVOWEL=0.997] X-Spam-Score: 0.588 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200603/138 X-Sequence-Number: 9728 > Um, what other resources are rated higher? If you'll pardon my > ignorance, what other resources is the search engine considering at all? Below is the weights. As John said earlier they just decide who's links show up first. It seems to me that archives should be secondly only to www.postgresql.org. Once the new techdocs is live and we get some solid content on there, then we can push that up. Thoughts? SiteWeight http://www.postgresql.org/ 100 SiteWeight http://advocacy.postgresql.org/ 100 SiteWeight http://jdbc.postgresql.org/ 100 SiteWeight http://developer.postgresql.org/ 100 # Authoritiative project site SiteWeight http://gborg.postgresql.org/ 75 SiteWeight http://pgadmin.postgresql.org/ 75 SiteWeight http://phppgadmin.sourceforge.net/ 75 SiteWeight http://pgfoundry.org/ 75 # User contributed stuff SiteWeight http://techdocs.postgresql.org/ 50 SiteWeight http://archives.postgresql.org/ 50 # Outside but reliable SiteWeight http://www.varlena.com/ 25 # And the rest... SiteWeight http://www.postgresql.cl/ 0 SiteWeight http://postgresql.ok.cz/ 0 SiteWeight http://www.postgresql.jp/ 0 SiteWeight http://www.postgresqlfr.org/ 0 SiteWeight http://www.linuxshare.ru/ 0 SiteWeight http://www.postgres.de/ 0 SiteWeight http://www.pgsqldb.org/ 0 SiteWeight http://www.postgresql.org.br/ 0 -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/