Message-ID: <443829BF.7070500@commandprompt.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 14:23:11 -0700
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Organization: Command Prompt, Inc.
User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060309)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
CC: pgsql-www@postgresql.org,
	PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Further SPI
References: <200603011124.21187.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<4423485E.4030009@commandprompt.com>
	<4437F8E3.6060202@commandprompt.com>
	<200604081259.55245.josh@agliodbs.com>
In-Reply-To: <200604081259.55245.josh@agliodbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Josh,
> 
>> Let me first say that I know the intent of the SPI is good and I did
>> vote for the transition to it. However as I see the implementation of
>> its abilities I am embarrased.
> 
> Chill the heck out.   It's not ready yet, why do you think we haven't 
> advertised it?   

There is nothing to chill out about. I am making an observation about 
the current state of things and offered feedback.

> 
> We're currently working on accepting international credit card donations over 
> the web.  Have some darned patience.

I am not concerned about international credit cards, and that won't 
really help the situation.

My entire post was about process flow. It had nothing to do with whether 
SPI was bad or good.

Joshua D. Drake


> 


-- 

             === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
       Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
       Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
                      http://www.commandprompt.com/