Message-ID: <44636A7B.20707@commandprompt.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:46:51 -0700
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Organization: Command Prompt, Inc.
User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060309)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
CC: PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Search thoughts
References: <446280EB.3090307@commandprompt.com>
In-Reply-To: <446280EB.3090307@commandprompt.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reposting because I realize that everyone was in bed or heading home 
when this came through:

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have been doing some example searching with our search engine and was 
> wondering if we can adjust the weights a little differently. For example:
> 
> ALTER TABLE, first link is:
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/files/documentation/books/aw_pgsql/node203.html
> 
> Which although accurate is way out dated. It seems we should weight a 
> docs search higher with the current docs having the most weight?
> 
> The same happens with many of the commands such as CREATE INDEX...
> 
> Joshua D. Drake
> 


-- 

            === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
      Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
      Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
                     http://www.commandprompt.com/