Message-ID: <44A5DE81.8080309@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 21:31:29 -0500
From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060619)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Notes on converting from MySQL 5.0.x to PostgreSQL
References: <b0f0a0e00606300617j2ed6dd4cub7bc2db972f6211a@mail.gmail.com>
	<1151680333.13129.55.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
	<44A5418F.8040901@cox.net> <60odwauy1p.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com>
In-Reply-To: <60odwauy1p.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Chris Browne wrote:
> ron.l.johnson@cox.net (Ron Johnson) writes:
> 
>> Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> However, the more interesting thing here, is that every
>>> statement, including DDL is transactable, except for a couple of
>>> big odd ones, like create database. So, in postgresql, you can do:
>>>
>>> begin;
>>> create table xyz...
>>> alter table abc...
>>> insert into abc select * from iii
>>> update iii...;
>>> drop table iii;
>>> (oops, I messed up something)
>>> rollback;
>> But isn't that what it means to be "transactional"?  Or am I spoiled
>>  by my "big, expensive enterprise database"?
> 
> DDL commonly hasn't been "able to be rolled back," even in "big,
> expensive" databases...

I guess I'm just fortunate...

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEpd6BS9HxQb37XmcRAgu8AKCqp6KxNYoa0tIcmbglG8XXSzgXpQCgjDLv
vYkFNzwXF1K+b9ZNK6Svr64=
=mW9L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----