X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2439FB218 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 18:39:34 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 43771-06 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 18:39:33 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-130.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE7499FB20E for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 18:39:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.embarqhsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k71LdSHx024381 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:39:29 -0700 Message-ID: <44CFCA0E.8020002@commandprompt.com> Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 14:39:26 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060615) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Momjian CC: PostgreSQL www , Tom Lane , "Marc G. Fournier" Subject: Re: Mail archive indexes are broken, URLs too References: <200608012136.k71LaTe11804@momjian.us> In-Reply-To: <200608012136.k71LaTe11804@momjian.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.3, clamav-milter version 0.88.3 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Tue, 01 Aug 2006 14:39:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.221 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200608/4 X-Sequence-Number: 10395 Bruce Momjian wrote: > Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> Is anyone working on this? Marc? If not, who can make these >>> modifications to the archive numbering? >> I believe Marc is the only one that can at last I heard on this, he >> disagreed with rolling back the change. > > I have heard no reason he doesn't like the change, and unless he can > convince most of us, it is time to make the change. > Marc wrote: Nope, for one simple reason ... if, for some reason, at some point in the future, we have to regenerate everything anyway (ie. the last time we did a major template change for the archives), all the #'ng is going to end up reverting back to what it is now ... so we'd only be 'delaying the inevitable' ... On July 17th. Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/