X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9422E9FB1F0 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:41:28 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17172-09 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:41:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-130.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964899FB1EB for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:41:24 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.embarqhsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7BFfI4L031380 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:41:19 -0700 Message-ID: <44DCA51F.70905@commandprompt.com> Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:41:19 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Momjian CC: PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: Is archives working for August? References: <200608111515.k7BFF6Z16743@momjian.us> In-Reply-To: <200608111515.k7BFF6Z16743@momjian.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.3, clamav-milter version 0.88.3 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:41:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.135 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200608/88 X-Sequence-Number: 10479 Bruce Momjian wrote: > Uh, this still is not working. Can someone else confirm the failure? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Bruce Momjian wrote: >> I just searched the PostgreSQL archives for 'packages' sorted by date: >> >> http://search.postgresql.org/archives.search?cs=utf-8&fm=on&dt=back&q=packages&ul=http%3A%2F%2Farchives.postgresql.org%2F%25&dp=0&o=0&ps=20&s=date >> >> The first item is July, not August, even though there was a posting I can confirm this behavior. However I have not confirmed that it is the archives versus the search engine. Search may not have indexed it yet. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/