X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0479FB377 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:09:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 91402-09 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:08:57 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-130.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD239FB375 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:08:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.embarqhsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7BG8p9Q031809 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:08:52 -0700 Message-ID: <44DCAB94.4040401@commandprompt.com> Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:08:52 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Momjian CC: PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: Is archives working for August? References: <200608111551.k7BFpxQ19853@momjian.us> In-Reply-To: <200608111551.k7BFpxQ19853@momjian.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.3, clamav-milter version 0.88.3 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:08:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.185 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200608/90 X-Sequence-Number: 10481 >>>> The first item is July, not August, even though there was a posting >> I can confirm this behavior. However I have not confirmed that it is the >> archives versus the search engine. Search may not have indexed it yet. > > But the posting is from August 7: > > * From: "Pavel Stehule" > * To: pgsql-hackers ( at ) postgresql ( dot ) org > * Subject: proposal for PL packages for 8.3. > * Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 11:44:42 +0200 > > Certainly our delay for indexing isn't four days. I don't know :) I was just saying that I haven't confirmed it. I do not like to make assumptions. Sinceerely, Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/