X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40F39FD0DE for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:41:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44002-03 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:41:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from mail-ihug.icp-qv1-irony5.iinet.net.au (ihug-mail.icp-qv1-irony5.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.199]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9B29FD0DF for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:41:32 -0300 (ADT) Received: from 124-168-128-123.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO [192.168.0.248]) ([124.168.128.123]) by mail-ihug.icp-qv1-irony5.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 29 Aug 2006 01:41:30 +0800 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-IronPort-AV: i="4.08,176,1154880000"; d="scan'208"; a="894405815:sNHT13526454" Message-ID: <44F32ABA.20507@mira.net> Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 03:41:14 +1000 From: Naz Gassiep User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: PostgreSQL web site Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200608/115 X-Sequence-Number: 10506 Just a suggestion, why don't the web admins turn mod_gzip on? There are no downsides, and it would likely make a fairly large impact on bandwidth bills. Think of all the people browsing the PG documentation (myself included). Not only would bandwidth bills go down, responsiveness on the docs would be higher as well. Even if there is no bandwidth saving (if your b/w is free for instance), I'm of the opinion that mod_gzip and mod_deflate should be used unless there is a compelling reason not to. Sorry if this has been discussed before, but I thought it was worth mentioning on the off chance it hadn't. - Naz.