public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Lukas Kahwe Smith <[email protected]>
To: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL rebranding
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 10:13:56 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Josh Berkus schrieb:
> Lukas,
>
>>>> Illustra, EnterpriseDB, Bizgres, BizgresMPP, Mammoth, Red Hat
>>>> Database, Netezza, parACCEL
>
> Note that BizgresMPP, Netezza, UltraSQL and Illustra had substantial code
> changes from the Postgres they branched off of. For Netezza, for example,
> it would be more accurate to say that they *used* PostgreSQL code rather
> than re-branding it ... Postgres comprises only about 1/4 to 1/3 of their
> code according to the Netezza president.
Yeah thats fine. Like I said my definition of what I am looking for is
kinda fuzzy (I will try to further clarify it - I think the best
approach so far has been to say anything that either tries to be a fork
by renaming or that is a fork by changing/adding significant code that
is not intended to be made available upstream).
Anyways thanks for all the input.
So should I work on this inside the newly build wiki? I guess I will
just ask the maintainer for an account and I will see what happens :)
Otherwise I will probably just publish the list on my open source
related stuff wiki ..
regards,
Lukas
view thread (34+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL rebranding
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox