X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6979FB2F5 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:57:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12729-02-4 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:57:01 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from floppy.pyrenet.fr (floppy.pyrenet.fr [194.116.145.2]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD8A9FB2F7 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:50:30 -0300 (ADT) Received: by floppy.pyrenet.fr (Postfix, from userid 106) id 3E20030E09; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 11:50:29 +0200 (MET DST) From: Ron Mayer X-Newsgroups: pgsql.advocacy Subject: Re: PostgreSQL rebranding Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:50:31 -0700 Organization: Hub.Org Networking Services Lines: 31 Message-ID: <44F55F67.6030407@cheapcomplexdevices.com> References: <44F3F0EC.2080709@pooteeweet.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.hub.org To: Lukas Kahwe Smith User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060713) In-Reply-To: <44F3F0EC.2080709@pooteeweet.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.046 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200608/182 X-Sequence-Number: 9646 Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > > I am collecting a list of PostgreSQL rebrands. > > So far I have the following: > > Illustra, EnterpriseDB, Bizgres, BizgresMPP, Mammoth, Red Hat Database, > Netezza, parACCEL Sun's "Thumper" [1] arguably counts at least as much as Netezza does, in that they're both hardware appliances derived more or less from PostgreSQL. And not sure if you'd count domain specific apps built on postgresql like Cisco's CSR / Carrier-Sensitive Routing product[2]. If you count that there are probably dozens of similar products that are built on top of a bundled postgresql. Fujitsu's FSP (Fujitsu Supported PostgreSQL) [3] should probably be added to your list. This one's a useful one to remember when you encounter a pointy-haired boss that wants support from a large company - you wouldn't want to trust your business to a database that's only supported by little companies like Oracle, would you? :-) I think like Netezza they heavily modified postgresql; in this case with their own storage manager. [1]http://www.techworld.com/storage/features/index.cfm?featureid=2738 [2]http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/csr/usergd/ver1_1/csrover.pdf [3]http://www.fastware.com/postgresql.html