Message-ID: <44F8D25A.6070902@commandprompt.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 17:37:46 -0700
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Organization: Command Prompt, Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
CC: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org,
	Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, josh@agliodbs.com
Subject: Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
References: <200609020029.k820Tg424841@momjian.us>
In-Reply-To: <200609020029.k820Tg424841@momjian.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Well, it's taken us the full month to get this far through the queue,
>>> so I'd sure like to have more people on board reviewing next time. 
>>> Alvaro helped but I miss Neil Conway, and some other people have
>>> helped in the past.  However --- the present situation has nothing to
>>> do with lack of reviewers, it's lack of time to finish the patches.
>> Not that I've had particularly plenty of time to give, but what's 
>> concerning me is that while we're moving toward an increasingly rigid 
>> process, we don't really have the process support to go with it.  How 
>> would anyone even know what patches are pending review?  Something to 
>> think about ...
> 
> They are in the patches queue?
> 
> 	http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches

Side note::

Perhaps this would be better served from the main website under the 
developer and community sections.

Joshua D. Drake


> 	


-- 

    === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/