Message-ID: <4513FC72.6070308@commandprompt.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 08:08:34 -0700
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Organization: Command Prompt, Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Magnus Hagander <mha@sollentuna.net>
CC: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, "Gavin M. Roy" <gmr@ehpg.net>,
	"Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <ads@pgug.de>,
	PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: About docbot
References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0609220035420.9196@base.wars-nicht.de>
	<45132ECB.1010301@commandprompt.com>
	<94E29260-41B1-4B9A-93A6-523364021B9F@ehpg.net>
	<20060922021052.GB3402@fetter.org>
	<6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA356F5@algol.sollentuna.se>
In-Reply-To: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA356F5@algol.sollentuna.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> Sounds iffy to me.   Lending the hostname makes this an official
>> (or
>>> officially endorsed) thing.  Would it be branded and such the
>> same as
>>> the main website?
> 
> Also, we have been working hard to *decrease* the number of distinct
> websites in the PostgreSQL domain. So please let's try to avoid adding
> another one if we can.
> 
> Now, *assuming* this is a service that we want on the main site (I'm not
> taking position on that yet, but it does seem pretty nifty), wouldn't
> the logical place be to have it on http://search.postgresql.org, along
> with the standard search?

Oh that is interesting... we could certainly do that.

Joshua D. Drake


-- 

    === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/