Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279039FB2F0 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 04:40:13 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 64692-04 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 04:40:07 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from developer.pgadmin.org (developer.pgadmin.org [63.246.23.140]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F023E9FB2E5 for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2007 04:40:06 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.0.40] ([62.232.55.118]) (authenticated bits=0) by developer.pgadmin.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0C8KbkQ017049 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:20:38 GMT Message-ID: <45A7495E.7000102@postgresql.org> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:39:58 +0000 From: Dave Page User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" CC: josh@agliodbs.com, pgsql-www@postgresql.org, Greg Sabino Mullane Subject: Re: Problems with pgsql-announce References: <200701081202.54350.josh@agliodbs.com> <1F8EBA252898A263D638F137@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <1F8EBA252898A263D638F137@ganymede.hub.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 OpenPGP: url=http://www.pgadmin.org/pgp/davepage.pgp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200701/49 X-Sequence-Number: 11316 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > --On Monday, January 08, 2007 12:02:53 -0800 Josh Berkus > wrote: > >> Greg, > >>> Yeah, something weird is going on there. From looking at the moderation >>> queue, it seems everyone is getting three or four duplicates. Maybe >>> we can simply turn that off, Marc? >> ... not if duplicates are actually being received; we don't want 3-4 or >> each message. > > Right now, any duplicates are supposed to be shuffled to the moderators queue > to deal with ... what the filter is *supposed* to deal with is spam, which > tends to be alot of duplicates of the same message with different headers ... Don't think I ever saw one in the queue. Plenty of bounces though... > If I remove the duplicate altogether, I suspect that there won't be much change > on the lists themselves, but I don't know for sure ... It hasn't made any difference whatsoever to the slaves list, except that we now get the reports we expect to see. I realise there's a difference between that and other lists, but it does still get spam. /D