Received: from localhost (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893E99FB4D9 for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:46:33 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32545-08 for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:46:26 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC989FB398 for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:46:30 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.199.197] (c213-100-160-41.swipnet.se [213.100.160.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF1FDDCC168; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:46:28 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45B29BC7.3030606@hagander.net> Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:46:31 +0100 From: Magnus Hagander User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Momjian CC: Robert Treat , Tom Lane , pgsql-www@postgresql.org, perrym3@gmail.com Subject: Re: Patch for text.css References: <200701202213.l0KMD3O02617@momjian.us> In-Reply-To: <200701202213.l0KMD3O02617@momjian.us> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200701/75 X-Sequence-Number: 11342 I was hoping someone else would comment on which one of the two they preferred before we committed it. And then I promptly forgot about it ;-) So, which one do people prefer? //Magnus Bruce Momjian wrote: > Are we going to apply this? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> Robert Treat wrote: >>> On Monday 08 January 2007 11:20, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>>> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 08:53:30PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >>>>> Magnus Hagander writes: >>>>>> Or should we perhaps just stop setting a color at all on it? That would >>>>>> let the browser choose color? >>>>> I wouldn't vote for that; the odds are good that the browser's defaults >>>>> would look ugly, or maybe even be nearly invisible against our >>>>> backgrounds. We *should* set the link colors ... just not to the same >>>>> thing. >>>> I've applied the patch to http://magnus-master.pgadmin.org with the >>>> color as suggested, for review. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? Different color? Suggestions? >>>> >>> I had a hard time differentiating it last night, so I changed it to use the >>> standard color on http://xzilla.postgresql.org just to get a different look. >>> Anyone interested in comparing can check it out. >> I personally think yours is clearer, but I'm a bit concerned on the >> third opinion ;-) Anybody else care to chime in? >> >> //Magnus >> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to >> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not >> match >