Received: from localhost (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28CE9FA2A1 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 13:24:20 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92580-04 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 13:24:09 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CF69FA434 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 13:24:10 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.199.197] (c213-100-160-41.swipnet.se [213.100.160.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0939EDCC20B; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 18:24:08 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45C8B9BB.8040305@hagander.net> Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 18:24:11 +0100 From: Magnus Hagander User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" CC: "Joshua D. Drake" , josh@agliodbs.com, pgsql-www@postgresql.org, Devrim GUNDUZ Subject: Re: Majordomo2 (Was: Re: Switching to mailman (Re: [Fwd: NDN: Re: [ODBC]) Connect without queries?]) References: <45C388B4.4010407@commandprompt.com> <1170713191.3056.34.camel@laptop.gunduz.org> <200702051417.53383.josh@agliodbs.com> <45C7C5EC.9040503@commandprompt.com> <20070206090153.GI6515@svr2.hagander.net> <20070206150904.GB13816@svr2.hagander.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200702/122 X-Sequence-Number: 11527 Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> I thought outbound delivery was handled by postfix? Having it deliver >> 23k emails should be trivial. > > it should be, but postfix is setup with a content_filter to send the email(s) > through MAIA for virus/spam filtering, and the content_filter is both inbounce > and outbound ... that is where it was getting backlogged, not in postfix itself > ... Given this, and many other comments, the first thing I would do is to decouple the lists from the hub.org mail infrastructure. Lists have very different requirements from "normal mailboxes" in my experience, and should have a dedicated path. That will also make things easier to track. Put up a dedicated system (VM) for it. That will make everything easier. >> (I have been looking for info on mj2 for a different project as well, >> but had to rule it out comlpetely because I could find no documentation >> and no information whatsoever on the web) > > I'll pass on your comment ... the documentation is 'internal', and very > extensive (almost overwhelmingly so at times) ... but, did you check out > ... ewww, even those pages leave alot to be desired > ... I actually found that page as well before. It's got updates until 2004... (and the whole page is labeled, on the front page, as being old information..) So yeah, they definitely have some work to do there. //Magnus