Received: from localhost (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0320B9FB722 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 07:34:11 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00950-06 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 07:34:04 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9A19FB6E1 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 07:34:08 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.199.196] (c213-100-160-41.swipnet.se [213.100.160.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC447DCC410; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 12:34:06 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45D839B5.7010703@hagander.net> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 12:34:13 +0100 From: Magnus Hagander User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guillaume Lelarge CC: Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-www@postgresql.org, Adrian Maier Subject: Re: Multi-language to be or not to be References: <45CF18A1.1090903@hagander.net> <20070212085006.GC4432@svr2.hagander.net> <200702121016.11272.peter_e@gmx.net> <20070212093602.GF4432@svr2.hagander.net> <45D06C71.5040302@lelarge.info> <45D0C9A9.3050605@hagander.net> <45D0DEA5.6020003@lelarge.info> <45D0E362.1020903@hagander.net> <45D0ECCB.9020802@lelarge.info> In-Reply-To: <45D0ECCB.9020802@lelarge.info> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.052 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, BAYES_50 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200702/226 X-Sequence-Number: 11631 >> Okay. Let me then ask the other thing that we really haven't discussed: >> Do we want the language site to be served up automatically. That's >> really what the code is all about today. If your browser is set to >> prefer French, we'll serve up the French version of the page (if >> available). While convenient, I personally don't like sites that do this >> for me (I've reconfigured my browser to put English as the top language >> for that reason). > > I kind of agreed with you on this one. I particularly hate when google > put me on their french search website when I really asked to be in the > english one. I hate this because, with the french search website, french > pages are ranked higher than others. But I don't think this will be the > point here. If you have a browser configured to put french as top > language, that's just because you prefer french pages. And if you don't > want that, you will have a combo to choose another language. Well, google is much worse than that. They put you in the language corresponding to *where you are*, and completely ignore your browsers setting. So when I'm in France, I get google in French. Imagine the joy when you're in Japan... But nobody is suggesting we do that, I hope :-) //Magnus