Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE469FB3BB for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 07:38:29 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01640-05 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 07:38:19 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from sd-2317.dedibox.fr (sd-2317.dedibox.fr [88.191.17.192]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984279FB3E2 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 07:38:23 -0400 (AST) Received: from sd-2317.dedibox.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sd-2317.dedibox.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A468F01E; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 12:38:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.64] (ASte-Genev-Bois-153-1-61-138.w81-249.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.249.211.138]) by sd-2317.dedibox.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF6C230B; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 12:38:18 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45D83ACE.9030905@lelarge.info> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 12:38:54 +0100 From: Guillaume Lelarge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (X11/20070116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Magnus Hagander Cc: Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-www@postgresql.org, Adrian Maier Subject: Re: Multi-language to be or not to be References: <45CF18A1.1090903@hagander.net> <20070212085006.GC4432@svr2.hagander.net> <200702121016.11272.peter_e@gmx.net> <20070212093602.GF4432@svr2.hagander.net> <45D06C71.5040302@lelarge.info> <45D0C9A9.3050605@hagander.net> <45D0DEA5.6020003@lelarge.info> <45D0E362.1020903@hagander.net> <45D0ECCB.9020802@lelarge.info> <45D839B5.7010703@hagander.net> In-Reply-To: <45D839B5.7010703@hagander.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.255 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, BAYES_40, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL X-Spam-Level: * X-Archive-Number: 200702/227 X-Sequence-Number: 11632 Magnus Hagander a écrit : >>> Okay. Let me then ask the other thing that we really haven't discussed: >>> Do we want the language site to be served up automatically. That's >>> really what the code is all about today. If your browser is set to >>> prefer French, we'll serve up the French version of the page (if >>> available). While convenient, I personally don't like sites that do this >>> for me (I've reconfigured my browser to put English as the top language >>> for that reason). >> I kind of agreed with you on this one. I particularly hate when google >> put me on their french search website when I really asked to be in the >> english one. I hate this because, with the french search website, french >> pages are ranked higher than others. But I don't think this will be the >> point here. If you have a browser configured to put french as top >> language, that's just because you prefer french pages. And if you don't >> want that, you will have a combo to choose another language. > > Well, google is much worse than that. They put you in the language > corresponding to *where you are*, and completely ignore your browsers > setting. So when I'm in France, I get google in French. Imagine the joy > when you're in Japan... > > But nobody is suggesting we do that, I hope :-) > Well, I know I'm not suggesting this :-D -- Guillaume.