Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70859FBE0A for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:06:52 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11620-03 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:06:47 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-254.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732219FBE15 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:06:46 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.embarqhsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l1LK6bXd021204 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:06:37 -0800 Message-ID: <45DCA661.2010008@commandprompt.com> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:06:57 -0800 From: "Joshua D. Drake" Organization: Command Prompt, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070103) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruno Wolff III , Bruce Momjian , Magnus Hagander , Andrew Hammond , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them? References: <20070221144716.GA21044@svr2.hagander.net> <200702211507.l1LF7Me12089@momjian.us> <20070221200138.GA9506@wolff.to> In-Reply-To: <20070221200138.GA9506@wolff.to> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.5, clamav-milter version 0.88.5 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:06:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200702/30 X-Sequence-Number: 4161 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 10:07:22 -0500, > Bruce Momjian wrote: >>

All users should upgrade to the most recent minor release as soon >> as it is available. While upgrades always have some risk, PostgreSQL >> minor releases fix only common bugs to reduce the risk of upgrading. >> The community considers not upgrading more risky that >> upgrading.

>> >> What should change about this text? > > The "soon as available" seems to be too aggressive to me. This seems to > suggest (to me at least) that these upgrades are so important that you > might want to skimp on QA to get them in place rapidly. While that may > sometimes be true, I don't think it is always the case for everybody. Hmmm how about: All users should upgrade to the most recent minor release as soon as is reasonable for the environment. While upgrades always have some risk, PostgreSQL minor releases fix only bugs to reduce the risk of upgrading. To reduce issues a user may encounter the community strongly suggests reviewing of the release notes for their particular version. -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/