Message-ID: <45DE2AED.1040306@commandprompt.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:44:45 -0800
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Organization: Command Prompt, Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070103)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Hammond <andrew.george.hammond@gmail.com>
CC: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
	pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] should we have a separate page that clearly defines what
	a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
References: <20070221144716.GA21044@svr2.hagander.net>	
	<200702211507.l1LF7Me12089@momjian.us>	
	<5a0a9d6f0702211113v740f5014m6e1df594303196b2@mail.gmail.com>	
	<45DD8E15.2050006@hagander.net>
	<5a0a9d6f0702221541x71705642if61ab67ef32d6cdb@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5a0a9d6f0702221541x71705642if61ab67ef32d6cdb@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


>> > On the front page, we already have "Latest Releases" with links to the
>> > most recent release for each version still actively maintained and
>> > release notes.  (Would it make sense to change that title from "Latest
>> > Releases" to "Actively Maintained Releases")
>>
>> I think not. The meaning is "latest releases available for each branch",
>> not "these are the actively maintained branches".
> 
> Why aren't 7.3.18, 7.2.8, 7.1.6, etc there then?
> 
> Clearly there is some criteria for which branches are presented there.

<7.3 is EOL. We still back patch what we can but they are considered
deprecated.

Joshua D. Drake

-- 

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/