Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980DF9FB3BC; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:27:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12065-07; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:27:21 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78EF9FB3B3; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:27:24 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.199.196] (c213-100-160-41.swipnet.se [213.100.160.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634B0DCC64C; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:27:23 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45F5C5CB.7060902@hagander.net> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:27:39 +0100 From: Magnus Hagander User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Page CC: Andrew Hammond , Bruce Momjian , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: Re: [DOCS] should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them? References: <20070221144716.GA21044@svr2.hagander.net> <200702211507.l1LF7Me12089@momjian.us> <5a0a9d6f0702211113v740f5014m6e1df594303196b2@mail.gmail.com> <45DD8E15.2050006@hagander.net> <45E11966.70604@postgresql.org> In-Reply-To: <45E11966.70604@postgresql.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200703/20 X-Sequence-Number: 11717 Dave Page wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> I'm bouncing this over to -www as well to hear what people think about >> that part. If we do that, I'd definitely like to see a proper page and >> not just a FAQ link. > > Agreed, though there's no reason not to have both. Including it on the > main site will add an air of legitimacy to satisfy PHBs. I've added such a page to the site now, and linked it in from the support section and from the front page. The text is more or less copied directly from the FAQ. Updates to the text are always welcome ;-) I suggest that we remove it from the FAQ, or replace it with a reference to the website, once the site has updated. //Magnus