Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C689FB64E for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:42:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18990-01; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:42:35 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A63B9FA4A0; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:42:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from dynamic.hagander.net ([127.0.0.1]) (encrypted and authenticated) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD8EDCC6E1; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 22:42:35 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45FDB25C.4010508@hagander.net> Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 22:42:52 +0100 From: Magnus Hagander User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0pre (Windows/20070317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Page CC: PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: Remembering the last used mirror References: <200703182034470000@268949553> In-Reply-To: <200703182034470000@268949553> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.017 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, BAYES_50 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200703/35 X-Sequence-Number: 11732 Dave Page wrote: > >> (Or for that matter, does anybody think this whole >> thing is a crappy idea?) > > Yes, we used to do that and it was a real pita that caused nothing but trouble. Really? That must've been before my time, 'cuz I don't remember any of that. Out of curiosity, exactly what were the issues, if you recall? (Not questioning you, just want to know given that so many others to it that way..) > Please do not commit. Ok, I won't. //Magnus