Message-ID: <462CE1F9.4010903@hagander.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:42:33 +0200
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4pre (Windows/20070421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
CC: josh@postgresql.org, pgsql-www <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-slavestothewww] New News Entry (id: 791)
References: <200704231637.l3NGbOi10866@momjian.us>
In-Reply-To: <200704231637.l3NGbOi10866@momjian.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 05:59:31AM +0000, World Wide Web Owner wrote:
>>> A new entry has been added to the news database.
>>>
>>> ----
>>> Submitted by: josh@postgresql.org
>>> Headline: Security Update Releases
>>> Summary:
>>>
>>> The PGDG has released a new minor version which fixes a privilege escalation exploit, as well as assorted minor issues.
>> <snip>
>>
>> How come we're not even listing the version numbers of our upgrades in the
>> news item?! A reason for it, or overlook?
> 
> Josh didn't have all releases mentioned in the original, so I didn't
> add it.  What I did do, though, was to add the release numbers to the
> email subject line.

I think it's important to include it, because a lot of people have no
idea what we're talking about if we just say "back branches" or
something like that. And I do believe it should go in the contents to be
completely clear.

//Magnus