Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9B59FB803; Fri, 11 May 2007 15:17:01 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 47364-01; Fri, 11 May 2007 15:16:56 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279DB9FB711; Fri, 11 May 2007 15:16:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from dynamic.hagander.net ([127.0.0.1]) (encrypted and authenticated) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5593DCC8FD; Fri, 11 May 2007 20:16:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4644B343.2020303@hagander.net> Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 20:17:39 +0200 From: Magnus Hagander User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4pre (Windows/20070508) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Joshua D. Drake" CC: "Marc G. Fournier" , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [whine] Slow moderation on postgres lists References: <4620CBAB.6090603@hagander.net> <5024210EB76FDC23B16F42E7@ganymede.hub.org> <4620F27D.5060909@hagander.net> <4620F3D6.60000@commandprompt.com> <4620F617.3080603@hagander.net> <001F3BCC7B487611058AA7A4@ganymede.hub.org> <20070420110640.GH13827@svr2.hagander.net> <46291710.30404@commandprompt.com> In-Reply-To: <46291710.30404@commandprompt.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200705/52 X-Sequence-Number: 11986 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > The list I sent you was 100% accurate based on the config files ... in > some cases (ie. Greg), it looks like master passwd was provided, > instead of setting up as an individual password ... its that that I > have to work on fixing ... greg can still moderate as things are now, > he's just not explicitly listed in the config files ... > >> I think what Magnus is trying to do is make sure that all admins are >> adhering to the same standards, which is, in this case to use pmt to >> document this type of stuff. > That was indeed it, and I'm still missing this documentation on pmt. Can we get an update there, please? //Magnus