Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03BC9FB59B; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 16:17:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21472-06; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 16:17:36 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACF79FB442; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 16:17:35 -0300 (ADT) Received: from dynamic.hagander.net ([127.0.0.1]) (encrypted and authenticated) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D513ADCCA1B; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:17:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46670885.1050207@hagander.net> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 21:18:29 +0200 From: Magnus Hagander User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5pre (Windows/20070606) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alvaro Herrera CC: nikolay@samokhvalov.com, pgsql-www@postgresql.org, PostgreSQL-documentation Subject: Re: [DOCS] Users comments don't migrate to docs for new version? References: <20070606164029.GB11800@alvh.no-ip.org> In-Reply-To: <20070606164029.GB11800@alvh.no-ip.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200706/7 X-Sequence-Number: 12046 Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote: >> I've just found (via google...) useful (for me) comments: >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/sql-createaggregate.html >> -- I mean users comments under primary contents of the page. >> >> These comments were written for 8.0, but are useful for the current >> versions too. What we have is the situation that reading docs for 8.2 >> people don't see these comments -- so this potentially useful >> information is lost. So, in this implementation the idea of comments >> for docs becomes weak in general. > > The thing to do in these cases is to move the useful info from the user > comments into the main doc text. Yeah, that's the idea. Tom often goes through the comments and puts stuff into the docs. But I'm sure there are a *lot* of other people who could help with that as well - read comments, figure out of they make sense, and submit a docs patch for the next version! //Magnus