Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0CF29FB599; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:41:53 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45233-03; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:41:47 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13199FB58C; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:41:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: from dynamic.hagander.net ([127.0.0.1]) (encrypted and authenticated) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 206C0DCCA5C; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:41:42 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <466ECCF9.1000308@hagander.net> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:42:33 +0200 From: Magnus Hagander User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5pre (Windows/20070611) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner CC: Dave Page , Robert Treat , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Moving the website project from GBorg References: <466E5422.9070102@postgresql.org> <466EB357.6060502@postgresql.org> <20070612150248.GJ3332@svr2.hagander.net> <200706121135.47971.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <466EBF6F.8040004@postgresql.org> <466ECAB5.40500@kaltenbrunner.cc> In-Reply-To: <466ECAB5.40500@kaltenbrunner.cc> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200706/49 X-Sequence-Number: 12088 Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > Dave Page wrote: >> Robert Treat wrote: >>> On Tuesday 12 June 2007 11:02, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 03:53:11PM +0100, Dave Page wrote: >>>>> Robert Treat wrote: >>>>>> If we're going to go through this trouble, is there some reason not to >>>>>> put up a public trac site some place and make use of it? >>>>> Seems a little overkill no? It's not like any of it would be used, other >>>>> than the SVN interface. >>>> I use Trac as a svn browser all the time, FWIW. I like it a lot more than >>>> viewcvs or whatever it is you use for pgadmin ;-) But that's just a matter >>>> of taste. Either one *works* fine :) >>>> >>> Well, you get integrated SVN with browser which is good, but also a bug >>> tracking thingy if people wanted to use that... and a wiki for public >>> documentation... all kinds of goodies. >> Pretty much all of which we already have don't we? > > well yeah and it is also a bit of duplication of the features we > (mostly) have on pgfoundry already ... Right. What we could do is just stick up a trac (or whatever, really) *until* pgfoundry has svn support. //Magnus