Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E629FA508; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:51:35 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 75122-03; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:51:29 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7564F9FB385; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:51:31 -0300 (ADT) Received: from dynamic.hagander.net ([127.0.0.1]) (encrypted and authenticated) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14ACEDCCB83; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:51:28 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <469518B1.6050309@hagander.net> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:51:45 +0200 From: Magnus Hagander User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5pre (Windows/20070711) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Nasby CC: Alvaro Herrera , nikolay@samokhvalov.com, pgsql-www@postgresql.org, PostgreSQL-documentation Subject: Re: [DOCS] Users comments don't migrate to docs for new version? References: <20070606164029.GB11800@alvh.no-ip.org> <46670885.1050207@hagander.net> <74EDDCA2-5C8F-46D1-BC15-3C531BD66D3E@decibel.org> In-Reply-To: <74EDDCA2-5C8F-46D1-BC15-3C531BD66D3E@decibel.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200707/14 X-Sequence-Number: 12161 Jim Nasby wrote: > On Jun 6, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote: >>>> I've just found (via google...) useful (for me) comments: >>>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/sql-createaggregate.html >>>> -- I mean users comments under primary contents of the page. >>>> >>>> These comments were written for 8.0, but are useful for the current >>>> versions too. What we have is the situation that reading docs for 8.2 >>>> people don't see these comments -- so this potentially useful >>>> information is lost. So, in this implementation the idea of comments >>>> for docs becomes weak in general. >>> >>> The thing to do in these cases is to move the useful info from the user >>> comments into the main doc text. >> >> Yeah, that's the idea. Tom often goes through the comments and puts >> stuff into the docs. But I'm sure there are a *lot* of other people who >> could help with that as well - read comments, figure out of they make >> sense, and submit a docs patch for the next version! > > It would be substantially easier to do that if there was an index page > that listed all comments. There is supposed to be one in the admin interface. But it seems I broke that with the latest update :-) Are you volunteering for doing some work on it? If so, I'm going to increase the priority of fixing that :-) //Magnus