Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A9F9FBBBF for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:34:16 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25831-07 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:34:12 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from developer.pgadmin.org (developer.pgadmin.org [63.246.23.140]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2009FBAED for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:34:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [172.24.32.15] ([62.232.55.118]) (authenticated bits=0) by developer.pgadmin.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6P8Xgp8024455 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 08:33:44 GMT Message-ID: <46A70AFB.7050006@postgresql.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:34:03 +0100 From: Dave Page User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (Windows/20070716) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alvaro Herrera CC: Magnus Hagander , decibel@decibel.org, pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Advocacy wiki References: <20070725054838.71190DCC143@svr2.hagander.net> <46A700A3.40903@postgresql.org> <20070725081046.GA5612@svr2.hagander.net> <46A706BC.9040702@postgresql.org> <20070725082936.GA3935@alvh.no-ip.org> In-Reply-To: <20070725082936.GA3935@alvh.no-ip.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200707/49 X-Sequence-Number: 12196 Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Dave Page wrote: > >> No, stuff for end users was specifically excluded from the wiki from the >> outset - and that should remain the case. We don't want 'unofficial' docs >> springing up all over the place - that's what techdocs is for. > > Doesn't that ring the bell that maybe techdocs is not as great as we > think? If people are desperately looking at alternatives, that may mean > something. What is it? > Afaik there are no outstanding bugs or feature requests with Techdocs - however it does require moderation before docs are published. Perhaps thats what people are trying to avoid? Regards, Dave