Received: from localhost (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42FE19FB7F4 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 21:52:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93034-09 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 21:52:33 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-254.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0889FB7CF for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 21:52:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.embarqhsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l710qbaK000578; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:52:37 -0700 Message-ID: <46AFD9C8.7030708@commandprompt.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:54:32 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Eisentraut CC: Josh Berkus , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Location of PostgreSQL Performance Test Lab References: <200707310919.10745.josh@agliodbs.com> <200707311830.52583.peter_e@gmx.net> <200707310943.18476.josh@agliodbs.com> <200707311914.40304.peter_e@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200707311914.40304.peter_e@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.1/3834/Tue Jul 31 02:25:17 2007 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:52:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200707/92 X-Sequence-Number: 12239 Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Dienstag, 31. Juli 2007 18:43 schrieb Josh Berkus: >> Peter, >> >>>> In addition to the machine Gavin Roy is loaning, I'm putting together >>>> an online performance test lab for the commmunity using donated >>>> equipment. Fairly soon, however, I have to decide where it will be >>>> hosted. >>> Why is it important that all the machines be hosted at one site? >> Administration > > Why does administration require that all the machines be hosted at one site? > Most administration is by remote login, and for the physical maintenance you > could have someone on site do it. > >> and the ability to to do multi-machine configurations. > > Well, that is interesting, but not a requirement. If the machines are not at > the same site, just don't use them for multi-machine configurations; just > pick different ones. (Hey, maybe someone wants to test WAN configurations.) > >> Also the ability to swap storage to newer machines. > > I don't know what you mean by this. Often IO has not improved, while the cage has (more ram, more processors, better cache etc)... So we can move the 22 spindle array to a new machine easily. Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/