Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A009FB2F5 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 04:46:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 78161-04 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 04:46:04 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from developer.pgadmin.org (developer.pgadmin.org [63.246.23.140]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505159FB2AC for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 04:46:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: from snake.local ([62.232.55.118]) (authenticated bits=0) by developer.pgadmin.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l717jU70012010 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 07:45:32 GMT Message-ID: <46B03A34.8090803@postgresql.org> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:45:56 +0100 From: Dave Page User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (Macintosh/20070716) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: josh@agliodbs.com CC: pgsql-www@postgresql.org, "Joshua D. Drake" , "Gavin M. Roy" , Peter Eisentraut Subject: Re: Location of PostgreSQL Performance Test Lab References: <200707310919.10745.josh@agliodbs.com> <46AFDA4C.9060808@commandprompt.com> <200707312017.49644.josh@agliodbs.com> In-Reply-To: <200707312017.49644.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 OpenPGP: url=http://www.pgadmin.org/pgp/davepage.pgp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200708/3 X-Sequence-Number: 12244 Josh Berkus wrote: > JD, > >> A. Command Prompt has physical access to its location >> B. Command Prompt has tons of bandwidth >> C. Command Prompt has power >> D. Command Prompt has proven a reliable provider >> E. Command Prompt loves the PostgreSQL community ;) >> F. We would probably have to charge a bit for power cause we are talking >> about some serious machines. >> G. We are close to Mark Wong as well > > OK, I'm sold, barring objections from the donors. Anyone? > How much of Command Prompt have access to the location? We've been waiting for a number of weeks to get the new pgFoundry machine plugged in and switched on because only JD had access to the DC and he was busy preparing for OSCON. I don't object in principle, I'd just like some reassurance that we won't see the perf machines lying idle or awaiting maintenance for the same or similar reasons. Regards, Dave