Message-ID: <46B49A37.1010405@hagander.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 17:24:39 +0200
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
CC: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>,
	pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>,
	pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki
References: <a5b9f5a05b5dd032d31c3185669fb093@biglumber.com>
	<200708041020.36108.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
	<46B4980C.5040700@postgresql.org>
In-Reply-To: <46B4980C.5040700@postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dave Page wrote:
>>> and I am reluctant to go that route anyway for public-facing pages
>>> that represent the project via a
>>> postgresql.org address.
> 
> I don't see any need to have any public facing pages on a Wiki - are we
> too lazy to write things up for the website when we want to present them
> to the world? It's not like it's difficult to do.
> 
> For collaboration work however, the Wiki is important I think - but I
> agree with Greg, we shouldn't need a second one. Can't we have an area
> on the current one with looser permissions?

Agreed. The whole idea behind a wiki is "reasonably loose permissions",
right? AS Greg already suggested, perhaps we just need a "better way"
for people to request permissions? (For example, right now it just says
"contact greg or neil", but it doesn't tell you how - not even an email
address...)

And a structure of the wiki that has a section for advocacy of course -
but we already have that.

/Magnus