Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EF29FA4B3; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 13:55:31 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69111-07; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 13:55:27 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-254.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457879FA4B6; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 13:55:28 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.embarqhsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l74GtNln026577; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 09:55:24 -0700 Message-ID: <46B4AFF5.1080001@commandprompt.com> Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 09:57:25 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Magnus Hagander CC: Dave Page , Robert Treat , pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org, Greg Sabino Mullane , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki References: <200708041020.36108.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <46B4980C.5040700@postgresql.org> <46B49A37.1010405@hagander.net> In-Reply-To: <46B49A37.1010405@hagander.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.1/3854/Fri Aug 3 21:49:48 2007 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Sat, 04 Aug 2007 09:55:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200708/39 X-Sequence-Number: 12280 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Magnus Hagander wrote: > Dave Page wrote: > Agreed. The whole idea behind a wiki is "reasonably loose permissions", > right? AS Greg already suggested, perhaps we just need a "better way" > for people to request permissions? (For example, right now it just says > "contact greg or neil", but it doesn't tell you how - not even an email > address...) Or just have them email pgsql-www with the request and have more than two people that can give the permissions? Joshua D. Drake - -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGtK/1ATb/zqfZUUQRAlbrAKCGx3yhw7H+GB0XbPS4RJMR9FzlYwCglTmR SPFq07j8CEbuszzGlfe1kig= =E7OR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----