Message-ID: <46B5ECDB.9030703@postgresql.org>
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 16:29:31 +0100
From: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
CC: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>,
	Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>,
	pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>,
	pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki
References: <200708042259470000@3169318656>
	<46B511A8.5030504@commandprompt.com>
	<46B5963D.3090607@hagander.net>
	<46B5E748.6040807@commandprompt.com>
In-Reply-To: <46B5E748.6040807@commandprompt.com>
OpenPGP: url=http://www.pgadmin.org/pgp/davepage.pgp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> Dave Page wrote:
> 
>>> The hard way, is exactly why we have neglected our partners (sponsors)
>>> to date, because of time, and resources. It is also the exact same
>>> reason that Berkus has *also* not provided a new sponsors page.
>> Ok. I have to admit I don't follow you - what exactly is your need? To
>> be able to dynamically handle *public* information about sponsors, or to
>> be bale to handle *confidential* information about them?
> 
> Let's take this to another thread. After arguing with dpage about this I
> realize we might be talking past each other.

Wouldn't be the first time, and I doubt it'll be the last. :-)

/D