Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DEA19FBD51 for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:35:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11213-03-2 for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:35:21 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-254.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854A49FBE8A for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:35:22 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.embarqhsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l78GZM0l006748; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:35:22 -0700 Message-ID: <46B9F148.80002@commandprompt.com> Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 09:37:28 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derek Rodner CC: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Subject: Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres References: <200708081736.26564.peter_e@gmx.net> <51494DB187D98F4C88DBEBF1F5F6D423022518CA@edb06.mail01.enterprisedb.com> In-Reply-To: <51494DB187D98F4C88DBEBF1F5F6D423022518CA@edb06.mail01.enterprisedb.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.1/3892/Wed Aug 8 03:05:19 2007 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Wed, 08 Aug 2007 09:35:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200708/135 X-Sequence-Number: 11705 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > thrive on that. My college basketball team is always the underdog. > EnterpriseDB is the underdog to Oracle. Postgres is the underdog to > MySQL. I am starting to get sick of that and want Postgres to stop > being the underdog. We know we are better than MySQL. Most of the I was with you, until right here. I think you have vastly misestimated the market. I will concur that PostgreSQL is the underdog to MySQL in one very specific sense: The ignorant and the code monkey. The knowledgable (including many of the fortune 5000) won't touch MySQL because it is broke, where PostgreSQL isn't. Now all that being said, there is zero argument that if you can get all the people running Ubuntu, wanting to run PostgreSQL that our community will grow. However I wonder, seriously how much of our community would be willing to deal with that level of newness. A good portion of our community are DBMS snobs. They have no basis in reality and are more interested in what is "right" versus what actually "works". Is that bad? I don't know, sometimes, sometimes not. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGufFHATb/zqfZUUQRAvSTAKCewRLOGayNQDGAo4lG/0WQcPof/gCcCChG RAg55bIQovy2M/DTAwYQJjs= =ts0g -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----