Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084179FA5CE for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 15:22:21 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30778-02 for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 15:22:16 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-254.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E3A9FB300 for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 15:22:15 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.embarqhsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l78IMGaf011873; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:22:16 -0700 Message-ID: <46BA0A55.3030806@commandprompt.com> Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 11:24:21 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Ellsworth CC: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Subject: Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres References: <200708081736.26564.peter_e@gmx.net> <51494DB187D98F4C88DBEBF1F5F6D423022518CA@edb06.mail01.enterprisedb.com> <200708081836.44990.peter_e@gmx.net> <46B9FA88.8000809@commandprompt.com> <219951fd0708081116v5c761346yc68d72b04ae9ee1d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <219951fd0708081116v5c761346yc68d72b04ae9ee1d@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.1/3892/Wed Aug 8 03:05:19 2007 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Wed, 08 Aug 2007 11:22:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200708/160 X-Sequence-Number: 11730 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mike Ellsworth wrote: > On 8/8/07, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >>> I will suggest, however, that knowingly wrong material should not be >> posted on >>> the postgresql.org web site any longer. >> How do we make that determination? >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Joshua D. Drake >> > > I was under the impression that www scrutinizes all Press Releases prior to > posting to the site. Not true? Well sure but... This particular release is really difficult. Blatant lies are one thing but seem my comment about marketing truth versus pedantic truth. An engineer shouldn't be making a determination if a marketing truth is valid. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGugpVATb/zqfZUUQRAnvOAJ9fs9GI/yTBn7F1W/0MehoT5MF+lQCfUMMi FQRBX4GqpJ0HAT+hTSzi1bw= =5EK6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----