Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6297C9FBADA
	for <pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Wed,  8 Aug 2007 15:32:55 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 03514-09 for
	<pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Wed,  8 Aug 2007 15:32:49 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
Received: from developer.pgadmin.org (developer.pgadmin.org [63.246.23.140])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650079FBB8B
	for <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>;
	Wed,  8 Aug 2007 15:32:21 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from snake.local ([89.240.63.124]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by developer.pgadmin.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l78IWJDp024790
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Wed, 8 Aug 2007 19:32:21 +0100
Message-ID: <46BA0C2F.3030305@postgresql.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 19:32:15 +0100
From: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mike Ellsworth <younicycle@gmail.com>
CC: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres
References: <f9cmli$2lu4$1@news.hub.org> <200708081736.26564.peter_e@gmx.net>	
	<51494DB187D98F4C88DBEBF1F5F6D423022518CA@edb06.mail01.enterprisedb.com>	
	<200708081836.44990.peter_e@gmx.net>	
	<46B9FA88.8000809@commandprompt.com>
	<219951fd0708081116v5c761346yc68d72b04ae9ee1d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <219951fd0708081116v5c761346yc68d72b04ae9ee1d@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3
OpenPGP: url=http://www.pgadmin.org/pgp/davepage.pgp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200708/162
X-Sequence-Number: 11732

Mike Ellsworth wrote:
> I was under the impression that www scrutinizes all Press Releases prior
> to posting to the site.  Not true?

We do. We check them for frequency of posting from a single company (so
noone floods the news pages), relevancy and appropriateness. We don't
check they are factually accurate, or try to second guess the intent of
the companies posting them.

And yes, I did approve that one - despite my employer it meets all our
agreed acceptance criteria.

Regards, Dave.