Received: from localhost (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16BF9FBB6B for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:25:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69735-01 for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:25:02 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from developer.pgadmin.org (developer.pgadmin.org [63.246.23.140]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49319FBCB8 for ; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:25:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: from snake.local ([89.240.63.124]) (authenticated bits=0) by developer.pgadmin.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l78JP3Yi025472 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Aug 2007 20:25:05 +0100 Message-ID: <46BA188B.7060007@postgresql.org> Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 20:24:59 +0100 From: Dave Page User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Joshua D. Drake" CC: Steve Atkins , pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Subject: Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres References: <200708081736.26564.peter_e@gmx.net> <51494DB187D98F4C88DBEBF1F5F6D423022518CA@edb06.mail01.enterprisedb.com> <200708081836.44990.peter_e@gmx.net> <46B9FA88.8000809@commandprompt.com> <219951fd0708081116v5c761346yc68d72b04ae9ee1d@mail.gmail.com> <46BA0C2F.3030305@postgresql.org> <219951fd0708081149u4d4ab0dfnc6e97984d530bada@mail.gmail.com> <4BA40DF8-788A-47B6-B080-FD1369186B22@blighty.com> <46BA1530.8080803@commandprompt.com> In-Reply-To: <46BA1530.8080803@commandprompt.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 OpenPGP: url=http://www.pgadmin.org/pgp/davepage.pgp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200708/172 X-Sequence-Number: 11742 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Steve Atkins wrote: >> On Aug 8, 2007, at 11:49 AM, Mike Ellsworth wrote: >>> Praise in public, criticize in private. >> This should be the main take away from this thread. > >>> Particularly when it's 'one of our own'. > > There is nothing wrong with public constructive criticism. The problem > is when people turn it into a war. I have zero problem with public > criticism of CMD that is kind of the FOSS way. Agreed 100%. If I've done something that others consider to be unacceptable for example, I want to know about it, and I'd like people to know I know about it. I will then do what I can to put it right. I think the difficulty perhaps comes when disagreements become more intense - JD and I for example often clash antlers, but certainly from my side there is no ill-will intended (in fact I'm looking forward to the day we finally meet and I can buy him a beer), just the desire to better what we're collectively doing. Anyhoo, this is getting off-topic... /D