Received: from localhost (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C859FB8AC; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 22:06:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34643-02-2; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 22:06:36 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-254.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FD49FB7D4; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 22:06:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (or-67-76-146-141.sta.embarqhsd.net [67.76.146.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l7916ahg029749; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 18:06:36 -0700 Message-ID: <46BA6917.6040804@commandprompt.com> Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 18:08:39 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Momjian CC: David Fetter , Dave Page , Mike Ellsworth , pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Subject: Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres References: <200708090045.l790jLa20504@momjian.us> In-Reply-To: <200708090045.l790jLa20504@momjian.us> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.1/3892/Wed Aug 8 03:05:19 2007 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Wed, 08 Aug 2007 18:06:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200708/194 X-Sequence-Number: 11764 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bruce Momjian wrote: > David Fetter wrote: >>> If people want to make 'no self approval of your or your companies >>> items' a new moderation rule, I have no problem with that. >> Good idea. We have enough people and enough diversity that making >> this explicit in the moderation rules is reasonable. :) >> >> Speaking of which, I'd love to figure out a system whereby I can >> avoid (the appearance of) similar conflicts of interest in the >> PostgreSQL Weekly News, as I have been in a position to announce >> things I've done, are doing, etc., and have never felt comfortable >> about it. I guess that's a subject for another thread, though. > > Disagree. We are not making policy over one person's suggestion here, > and taken to an extreem, this will slow us down, with zero cases of > conficts actually causing problems. I would prefer people act > responsibly rather than add more rules. Easy Bruce, this is something that the community is discussing and appears to agree with. Although I do think the PostgreSQL Weekly News on is kind of offtopic. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGumkXATb/zqfZUUQRAtRKAJ9PDw2y7HY+nH6fk7NjKUXdeBGJoACfSyl9 SByUMkkE8l5cnd4ypDTawTM= =hH0N -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----