Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A8B9FA0E0 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:01:31 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66822-03 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:01:20 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 626B99FA0D3 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:01:21 -0300 (ADT) Received: from dynamic.hagander.net ([127.0.0.1]) (encrypted and authenticated) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53018DCC8A0; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 19:01:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <470A6253.8040604@hagander.net> Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:01:07 +0200 From: Magnus Hagander User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Treat CC: PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: [PGWEB-COMMITS] By xzilla: Allow beta documentation to be referenced as /beta/ and allow References: <20071008162457.4A7A14142F@gborg.postgresql.org> <470A610D.2010802@hagander.net> <200710081259.22699.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <200710081259.22699.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200710/41 X-Sequence-Number: 12628 Robert Treat wrote: > On Monday 08 October 2007 12:55, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> pgweb-commits@gborg.postgresql.org wrote: >>> Log Message: >>> ----------- >>> Allow beta documentation to be referenced as /beta/ and allow comments on >>> beta pages. >> Sorry to be a PITA, but... >> >> 1) Why? I thought we had agreement on using /8.3/? >> > > I don't recall anyone actually discussing the use of /beta/. No, I suggested /8.3/, and nobody proposed anything else... >> 2) You do realise this leads to the mirror having to store *four* copies >> of the documentation, and not just two? >> >> 3) What do you plan to serve up on that URL once we're not in beta? >> Links will be all over the place, so it can't be deleted... >> >> > had this been discussed, someone probably would have brought up those 2 very > good questions :-) Right. so they're up now. If you agree with my concerns, perhaps we shouldn't put the docs up under that URL? //Magnus