Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4EF9F99CD; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:45:05 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66964-02; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:45:00 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (sca-es-mail-1.Sun.COM [192.18.43.132]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DCA19F9DED; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:44:59 -0300 (ADT) Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l9FFiwRA004525; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:44:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JPY00701M5YOD00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> (original mail from josh@agliodbs.com); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:44:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from josh-berkus-computer-2.local ([192.18.37.228]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JPY0054UMETL020@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com>; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:44:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:44:40 -0700 From: Josh Berkus Subject: Re: Approval process for news/events/training is broken In-reply-to: <471326F3.8090004@postgresql.org> To: Dave Page Cc: Magnus Hagander , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Message-id: <47138AE8.9060206@agliodbs.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <470A72CD.4050304@agliodbs.com> <200710120001.50415.josh@agliodbs.com> <470F3F7B.4030904@postgresql.org> <200710141454.44871.josh@agliodbs.com> <47131C0A.8070206@postgresql.org> <20071015081927.GB4653@svr2.hagander.net> <471326F3.8090004@postgresql.org> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200710/87 X-Sequence-Number: 12674 Dave, >> Also, looking back at the news just added today, is "EnterpriseDB Postgres" >> considered a "postgresql family product" or a commercial one? Maybe a >> guidance bullet on "downstream distributions"? > > It's certainly not commercial, but yes that does seem worth clarifying. Actually, I'd argue that it's commercial. That was what I had in mind when I drafted the rules. For one thing, like the tools SW makers, EDB tends to bury us under press releases and need reigning in, in a way that OSS projects generally don't. > It's a bit subjective. I'd be happy with any level of content from a > single session up, as long as it includes details so people don't spend > serious money getting somewhere only to find just a single session. Well, we need to draw some line for PostgreSQL content. A 200-session conference with one session which covers using PHP with PostgreSQL alongside MySQL and DB2 really shouldn't go on the site. Maybe we should just re-write that as "significant PostgreSQL content" and leave it up to WWW what "significant" is? > >> Training events - should we require that they include information about the >> cost to attend? > > Sounds reasonable. Sure. Mind you, they usually do. We haven't had a problem with trainers not providing enough content, just posting too frequently. BTW, have we fixed the training events so that they stop displaying once they start? --Josh