Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D4F9FA263 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 03:27:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 96976-09 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 03:27:36 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB729FA209 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 03:27:34 -0300 (ADT) Received: from dynamic.hagander.net ([127.0.0.1]) (encrypted and authenticated) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C62DCC972; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:27:33 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47257D55.4000906@hagander.net> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:27:33 +0100 From: Magnus Hagander User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" CC: Tom Lane , pgsql-www@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: Strange anoncvs sync behavior References: <8844.1193464744@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4722E85E.6010202@hagander.net> <472447AA.7060803@hagander.net> <4EF3AB927E353AA5605956EB@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <4EF3AB927E353AA5605956EB@ganymede.hub.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200710/157 X-Sequence-Number: 12744 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > --On Sunday, October 28, 2007 09:26:18 +0100 Magnus Hagander > wrote: > >> Marc G. Fournier wrote: >>> --On Saturday, October 27, 2007 09:27:26 +0200 Magnus Hagander >>> wrote: >>> >>>> work that Marc was doing on the tagging scripts to deal >>>> first with permissions and then with emails. >>> Pardon? >> You were hacking on the tag/branch stuff only to allow "pgsql" to do >> that, but then IIRC people spoke up and said they wanted it the other >> way around - only personal accounts doing it. Or something like that. > > Nope, actually, the problem was that the codeI added didn't work ... the > purpose was to prevent something like Michael Meskes accidentally running a tag > command, which is what prompted it all .. or, rather, it was to be restricted > to me alone vs pgsql ... shouldn't prevent doing the 'sync on tag' coding you > need to do, but thansk for the reminder, I will re-diving into getting that > restriction working properly .. Ah, that's what I meant, really :-) At least in that being the reason why I stopped looking at the other part, and then forgot about it. //Magnus