Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA539FA60A; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:54:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48270-05; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:53:57 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6AA9F93A1; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:54:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: from dynamic.hagander.net ([127.0.0.1]) (encrypted and authenticated) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0629CDCC9DC; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:54:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4725F40B.8000104@hagander.net> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:54:03 +0100 From: Magnus Hagander User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Page CC: PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: Inappropriate blog for the front page? References: <4725EEE2.8080709@postgresql.org> <4725F04E.5030904@hagander.net> <4725F2CE.6020600@postgresql.org> In-Reply-To: <4725F2CE.6020600@postgresql.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200710/163 X-Sequence-Number: 12750 Dave Page wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> Dave Page wrote: >>> Not sure this is something we want on the homepage: >>> >>> Hubert Lubaczewski: what pisses me off about postgresql >>> http://www.depesz.com/index.php/2007/10/28/what-pisses-me-off-about-postgresql/ >>> >>> Though I don't imagine we want to censor Hubert as he writes some >>> interesting and useful stuff. >>> >>> Thoughts? >> I say leave it there. The article brings up very valid points. It is >> among the "interesting and useful" stuff he writes. The title may be >> less than ideal, but hey, it'll cause people to read it :-) >> >> Just write a blog post of your own and this one will get kicked off the >> frontpage RSN :-P > > I'm not referring to the content - I wouldn't want to suggest stopping > anyone making valid criticism. I'm referring to the language which is > almost certainly offensive to many. Hmm. I obviously live in a very different society than you do, because I don't know of anybody who'd be offended by "pissed of". There are a lot of much worse ways of saying that that would offend people, but I don't see this as one. But that could be just me :-) My vote is still to keep it, but I certainly understand that others can see it differently. //Magnus