Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3DF09FA1C8 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 05:59:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66505-10 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 05:59:39 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25479FA028 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 05:59:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from dynamic.hagander.net ([127.0.0.1]) (encrypted and authenticated) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39EFEDCC975; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 09:59:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47299585.7030402@hagander.net> Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 09:59:49 +0100 From: Magnus Hagander User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane CC: "Marc G. Fournier" , pgsql-www@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: what is up with the PG mailing lists? References: <25716.1193887595@sss.pgh.pa.us> <26669.1193891360@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <26669.1193891360@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/12 X-Sequence-Number: 12790 Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" writes: >> I haven't noticed, but haven't been watchign for it ... can you send me full >> headers of one such affected? This one here seemed to be 'within minutes' :( > > Here's headers from a message I sent to -core today, which had about an > hour turnaround ... That one is clearly sitting waiting to go through the hub.org antispam for about an hour (between 18:33 ADT and 19:35 ADT). Oh, and the message you sent with this info just took about over 4 hours to get here, which happens fairly often. Headers from this one: Received: from mx2.hub.org (mx2.hub.org [200.46.204.254]) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC910DCC975 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 09:47:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [200.46.204.71]) by mx2.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4040A8B2859 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 05:47:46 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA66D9FB96F for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:29:30 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 91423-02-4 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:29:27 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0E89FA40C for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:29:23 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lA14TKZJ026670; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 00:29:20 -0400 (EDT) In this case, it took 4 hours to get from postgresql.org to mx2.hub.org, whereas all other steps were quick. So something's broken in the mail delivery apart from the antispam. //Magnus