Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658EF9F9CD0;
	Thu,  1 Nov 2007 09:16:10 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 66265-10; Thu,  1 Nov 2007 09:15:49 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C03B9FA242;
	Thu,  1 Nov 2007 09:15:55 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from dynamic.hagander.net ([127.0.0.1]) (encrypted and
	authenticated) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id
	D2289DCCA09; Thu,  1 Nov 2007 13:15:52 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4729C382.6010802@hagander.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:16:02 +0100
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
CC: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>,
	pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: what is up with the PG mailing lists?
References: <25716.1193887595@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<DADF296033D290EF9634F611@ganymede.hub.org>
	<26669.1193891360@sss.pgh.pa.us> <47299585.7030402@hagander.net>
	<47299957.5020605@postgresql.org> <2968.1193919208@sss.pgh.pa.us>
In-Reply-To: <2968.1193919208@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200711/19
X-Sequence-Number: 12797

Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> writes:
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> Oh, and the message you sent with this info just took about over 4 hours
>>> to get here, which happens fairly often. Headers from this one:
> 
>> It sat in the mod queue until I approved it earlier.
> 
> Magnus, don't you get notices from the mail daemon when a post of yours
> is held for moderator approval?  I do, so I know the difference between
> "slow" and "no moderator handy" ...
> 
> (I think actually that this behavior isn't default, which strikes me as
> a pretty dang poorly chosen default.)

Yeah. For my own posts it's generally not moderation. It happens with
big attachments sometimes, and then I get a notice. So in the cases that
my own mails are delayed to the lists, it's one of the other problems.
Harder to tell about somebody else.

Would be kinda handy if majordomo would put that into the headers
somewhere - e.g. "X-Released-From-Moderation: <date>" or something like
that.

//Magnus