Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C22879FA28E for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2007 04:33:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03748-06 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2007 04:33:47 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E6B9FA271 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2007 04:33:45 -0300 (ADT) Received: from dynamic.hagander.net ([127.0.0.1]) (encrypted and authenticated) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D69ADCCA0D; Fri, 2 Nov 2007 08:33:44 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <472AD2E4.9080302@hagander.net> Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 08:33:56 +0100 From: Magnus Hagander User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" CC: Tom Lane , Andrew Sullivan , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: what is up with the PG mailing lists? References: <25716.1193887595@sss.pgh.pa.us> <26669.1193891360@sss.pgh.pa.us> <47299585.7030402@hagander.net> <47299957.5020605@postgresql.org> <2968.1193919208@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20071101080959.49f3087b@scratch> <20071101152333.GM27676@crankycanuck.ca> <4729F105.30704@hagander.net> <1127E6493CBA8A29F343C4D7@ganymede.hub.org> <4729F7D2.6050608@hagander.net> <472A37FD.60501@hagander.net> <15696.1193952675@sss.pgh.pa.us> <5D3E2728B4A0BCE413C26F7A@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <5D3E2728B4A0BCE413C26F7A@ganymede.hub.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/58 X-Sequence-Number: 12836 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > --On Thursday, November 01, 2007 17:31:15 -0400 Tom Lane > wrote: > >> Magnus Hagander writes: >>> Oh, and the headers I sent were because the email was stuck in the >>> moderation queue. >> Yeah --- one of the worst problems in diagnosing this is that there's >> no way for anyone except the moderator to know if a delay was simply >> waiting-for-moderation or if it indicates an actual system problem. > >> What are the chances of getting something into the headers to indicate >> whether a message was delayed by moderation? > > I've asked on the mj2 list about this when someone mentioned it earlier in the > thread, and am just awaiting confirmation, but the initial answer seemed to > indicate that someone would have to do some perl programming for this, as it > isn't a pre-defined variable that we can access ... > > As I said, I'm waiting to hear back, but if my assessment is right, anyone > interested in writing some perl code? Have both a 'X-Approved-Date:' and an > 'X-Approved-Delay:' header would be cool ... Do we have any pointers as to where the code goes? I don't know how to find our way around the code, but if we can get a pointer to where it needs to go, someone can perhaps do something about it. But it's probably as much work for the mj2 folks to tell us where to put it as it would be for them to put it there themselves :-) //Magnus