Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCAB9F94E4 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2007 11:11:43 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03907-09 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2007 11:11:22 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from developer.pgadmin.org (developer.pgadmin.org [63.246.23.140]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A5A9F94D7 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2007 11:11:40 -0400 (AST) Received: from [172.16.0.65] ([78.146.239.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by developer.pgadmin.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lA4FB2vA017506 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 4 Nov 2007 15:11:06 GMT Message-ID: <472DE115.2050902@postgresql.org> Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 15:11:17 +0000 From: Dave Page User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" CC: Chander Ganesan , Kevin Hunter , "Joshua D. Drake" , Postgres WWW List , Peter Eisentraut Subject: Re: Training events policy ... first test case References: <200711031703310000@114527600> <20071103142105.2d29bc1b@scratch> <472D02A3.1070404@postgresql.org> <20071103205146.63a6997c@scratch> <472D505C.8010009@earlham.edu> <30F7311191EA4127FE35229B@ganymede.hub.org> <472D5E5F.8070703@otg-nc.com> <9599AD77F626EA5EFDBE4859@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <9599AD77F626EA5EFDBE4859@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/94 X-Sequence-Number: 12872 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > - --On Sunday, November 04, 2007 01:53:35 -0400 Chander Ganesan > wrote: > >> In the next six months, there are 21 events in 4 countries >> from 13 different companies, including PostgreSQL Administration, and >> PostgreSQL >> Database Implement ion and Performance Tuning events. > > You'd need to go something like: > > Over the next 6 months, there are 21 courses being offered in 4 > countries, split up as:

>

    >
  • 3 - Administration >
  • 2 - Implementation >
  • 9 - Tuning >
> > Or something like that ... That would require a much more significant redesign of the way we handle events which is not something I have time for atm unfortunately. For the record, I think we'd want to properly seperate them from the other events and allow them to be categorised in one or more categories (a single course might cover multiple topics). /D